| 本站网友 Della ip:188.143.232.* |
2016-08-23 04:37:00 发表 |
| Anonymous,I don’t see anything in Section 107 A (b) that suggests it to be read as &#d126;In8ian law’. There is a definite loophole in the Section. I am not going in the details of it as it already has been covered by the comments. If you are saying it has to be essentially Indian law then as Shamnad has already pointed out, it would be interesting to know as to why you think so or how does the section refers specifically to 'Indian law'. |
| |
|
网友评论仅供网友表达个人看法，并不表明信鸽365同意其观点或证实其描述
|
